History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis essay answers the following two artistic creation object question : Critic eachy assure the state that semisynthetic positivity and mixer constructionism argon exchangeable in rough serious respects . If they ar similar , what be the consequences of this for psychology s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions ar skeletal base on look into d unityHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical incontrovertibleness and neighborly constructionism are similar in some(prenominal) important respectsLogical advantageousness renderingLogical favourableness holds that school of thought should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http /encyclopedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as science and th at it should provide strict criteria for judging sentences sure , infatuated and intendless (Dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical positivism made use of emblematical synthetical corpse , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and bulky importance to the analysis of language of meaning . Philosophers in this sequence (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernismSocial constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the view that the phenomena of the social and cultural world and their meanings are created in human social interaction . Taken still , social constructionism can be applied to social research itself . The plan of attack often , though non exclusively , draws on idealist philosophic orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , similar universe (Stove , 1991Simil aritiesThe received view is that logical pos! itivism and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , because they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous betwixt the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is cognize and experienced from scientific knowledge . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not possible .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction between what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the commonly accepted principles of geometry to logic , math and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s afterwards defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear pop out claims that all meanings of scientific terms are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human intelligence or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is establish on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a scientific discipline develops in stage! s and is influenced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay